Step 1: Listen and take notes on the Lecture on
Values ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUVHc1l3fsQ )
Step 2: Read the .PDF from The Ethnic
Theory of Plane Crashes a chapter from Outliers: The Story
of Success by Malcolm Gladwell, pages 185-202. See .pdf in
Modules.
Step 3 : In a 200-300 word post,
answer the following questions: Analyze the Columbia airlines Avianca flight 052 situation
described in Outliers (pages 185-202) in terms of high
versus low context. These concepts are explained in the Lecture
on Values. (Note: Do not discuss power
distance as Gladwell already provides that analysis.) Did
the cockpit crew valued high or low context? Explain. Did
ground control valued high or low context. Explain. Imagine
you could go back in time before the plane crash. What specific
suggestions regarding intercultural compentence would
you offer to promote more competent intercultural communication between the
cockpit crew and ground control. Be specific. Don't
forget to integrate course terms from the Lecture on Values. Be sure not to
summarize the situation. This assignment is about analyzing the
situation. (Be sure to apply the suggestions from Analyzing
versus Summarizing in modules.)
The Columbia airlines Avianca
flight 052 situation described in Outliers involves the crash of a commercial
airplane in January 1990, resulting in the death of 73 passengers and crew
members. The incident highlights the importance of intercultural communication
and the high-context and low-context value orientations in such situations.
High-context cultures rely
heavily on nonverbal cues, context, and indirect communication to convey
meaning, while low-context cultures prefer explicit and direct communication.
In this scenario, the cockpit crew valued high-context communication, as they
were Colombian and accustomed to using nonverbal cues and indirect
communication. On the other hand, the ground control, consisting of North
Americans, valued low-context communication, relying heavily on explicit and
direct communication.
The communication breakdown
occurred due to the clash of cultural values between the cockpit crew and
ground control. The cockpit crew's use of indirect communication and their
reluctance to challenge the ground control's instructions ultimately led to the
crash. The ground control's failure to understand the indirect communication
and lack of assertiveness from the cockpit crew also played a crucial role in
the incident.
To promote more competent intercultural communication,
specific suggestions include:
1.
Provide intercultural
communication training to all individuals involved in air traffic control and
aviation operations, highlighting the differences in communication styles
between cultures, and promoting a better understanding of cultural values.
2.
Establish clear guidelines for
communication protocols in high-pressure situations, emphasizing the importance
of explicit and direct communication in such circumstances.
3.
Encourage assertiveness
training for pilots and flight crews, enabling them to communicate more clearly
and effectively with ground control, and preventing miscommunication due to
cultural differences.
4.
Foster an inclusive workplace
culture that promotes diversity and encourages individuals to be more aware of
different communication styles.
In conclusion, the Avianca Flight 052 incident highlights the importance of intercultural communication in high-pressure situations, and the role of cultural values in shaping communication styles. Promoting intercultural competence through training and awareness can help prevent communication breakdown and improve safety in aviation operations.
JOIN OUR STUDY GROUPS